By
virtue of the fact that my first sons were not of his blood and that they were
“genetically substandard” in the eyes of my N…neither could possibly have been
assigned the role of “Golden Child”. This coupled with the fact that the N was
frenetically jealous of any attention I paid to them and, most especially, any
love I displayed FOR them…they were doomed them from the beginning. In the beginning of the relationship, I believe I was placed in the role of the GOLDEN one for a short time, after which the N assumed that role and played it until the birth of our twins.
My
“Mr. Spock” inner voice did insist that I set certain boundaries for the N’s
interaction with my children. He NEVER professed to love the children and was
openly hostile toward them most of the time. He could not hide his disdain for
them and felt they were simply inconveniences that must be dealt with… takers
of his supply…weapons for use in controlling me and playthings that he could
torture with impunity.
I think he got a kick out of being PRAISED by outsiders
for this very torture. He presented this torture as “discipline” and was always
quick to set himself up as being the “savior” of my children. One who would
UNDO the damages done to them by an irresponsible Father, a damaged Mother and
spoiling, doting, catering, incompetent Grandparents. HE would teach them how
to survive in the REAL world! He had much support in this, thanks to his
twisting of facts and outright lies.. and most people on the outside saw his
efforts to FIX them as downright HEROIC. He felt that he was doing an exemplary
job at being a step-father despite MY constant need to interfere and our daily
struggles over his punishments and discipline
So…one
of my ONLY verbally communicated, unchanging and CONSTANT boundaries around my
children was that he was NEVER to touch them or PHYSICALLY punish them in ANY
way. Attempts to explain my reasons for this failed to meet his requirements
for logic so, on this point of discussion it simply became “Because I SAID SO
and they are MY CHILDREN!” This was NOT ambiguous in ANY way. I stated this
repeatedly and held firm to that one boundary. Because of this, it was
necessary for him to devise more COVERT ways of torturing them (of course I mean
DISCIPLINING them….). For many years I thought that this boundary was being respected,
but of course, as we know….the N will push at the boundaries on a daily
basis…not quite breaking them, exactly, but weakening them and twisting them to
the point where the intent of the boundary IS being violated even if the exact
boundary is not. He was aware he was not to TOUCH the boys…but he could still
THREATEN to do so when I was not around…he could still terrorize them…he could
still make life a living Hell in a million other ways…and he did. This was the
punishment THEY received for existing and being in his way and the punishment I
received for refusing to simply “trust him” and allow his physical aggression
toward them.
I
was constantly told that if I would allow him to do as he wanted, he would see
to it that the children grew up to be able survive in society…but, by
interfering, I was DOOMING them to be nothing but drains on society that would
amount to NOTHING in the end. My “Over-protectiveness” was simply a result of
my failure at Motherhood and the diseased environment in which I was raised! I
was making a deliberate decision to doom them and I should feel great shame in
not allowing him to step in and fix them. I was berated about this constantly
but deep inside “Mr. Spock” kept saying “NO!”…He does NOT LOVE THEM….he CANNOT
be allowed to physically discipline them! This “discipline” then becomes abuse
when it is given outside of the context of love and, deep inside, I had to
admit that I saw that he took PLEASURE in ANY excuse he could find to punish
them. He ENJOYED their suffering…the glint in his eye was a little brighter…the
depth of his laugh a little more devilish…that SMIRK that he used to have while
watching them being forced to do whatever it is that he decided was “apt
punishment” for their “crimes”.
People in a dysfunctional family have been known to adopt
one or more of these basic roles: (In
case anyone is unfamiliar with these terms, I am adding the meanings, and
ramifications, of these assignments here.)
Function
|
Description
|
Abuser
|
Person
committing abuses-controller
|
Enabler
|
If it weren't for the enablers, a family's dysfunction could not
long exist. The tragedy is that the enablers can't grasp that fact. Every
member in a dysfunctional family plays the enabler role to some extent. This
role was first identified in families where a "normal" spouse was
married to an alcoholic. Let's say for convenience only that Dad is the
alcoholic and Mom is not. She's keeping the family together -- heroic, martyr
Mom. She keeps his drinking a secret and enlists the children's cooperation
in deceiving the world. Thus he need not face public approbation for his
behavior. She lies to the boss for him when he calls in sick. She bails him
out of scrapes and sometimes out of jail itself. She cleans up the messes,
both physical and situational, that he's constantly making.
|
Hero
|
The
hero is the fixer-upper, the glue man. The hero keeps the dysfunctional
family functioning and takes up the slack where the parents don't have it
together. The hero may get the laundry done, fix meals, mind the smaller
kids, perhaps even nurture a disabled or dysfunctional parent (as when the
hero child tends to the needs of an alcoholic mother or father). The hero may
or may not receive praise and support within the family -- but from the
outside, the hero is acknowledged as the trustworthy, conscientious, mature,
capable kid.
|
Mascot
|
The
mascot is the black sheep with a white reputation, the family clown. He earns
his attention by grabbing it. Problems? Dissolve them with a laugh. Pain?
Joke it away. Distract, bring a smile, present a happy face. The mascot is
out to make you -- and himself -- forget for a few moments that life hurts
dreadfully. Frequently the grinning little guy who makes the tension bearable
with his zany humor is sadder inside than any other family member.
|
Lost Child
|
The lost child makes the perfect hero in a classic western or
romance novel, the loner who keeps his own counsel. While the hero is
excelling and the mascot is goofing around, and the scapegoat is getting into
scrapes, the lost child simply isn't noticed. Not there. The lost child might
be alone in her room or playing out in the garage. She doesn't say much,
doesn't stick out in the bunch, and probably enjoys escapist reading. The
lost child is nice. Constantly, unbearably, doggedly nice.
|
Scapegoat
|
The
scapegoat is the black sheep. Regardless what sweet words of denial the
scapegoat hears from his parent's lips, he knows down inside that this
household just isn't cutting it. He probably cannot articulate his loss, but
his love tank is staying on empty. Obviously someone is to blame, and
children, you will recall, are quick to assign any anomaly in the universe to
their own fault. The scapegoat deserves to be punished for this mess.
Besides, when he takes the blame he also gets attention. Ask any celebrity;
bad press is better than no press at all.
|
The Placater
|
Even a very small child can adopt the placater role. The
placater is going to make it all better somehow. He might distract and heal
by being the clown. He is often the hero. The placater knows what words to
say to reassure siblings, soothe Mom and get around Dad. A born negotiator,
the placater recognizes in advance the waves that might rock the family boat
and tries to still them and may even use an occasional white lie to keep the
family friction to a minimum.
|
The Martyr
|
The martyr will pay any personal price to alleviate the family
situation. The martyr sacrifices time, energy, and happiness to keep the
family together, to try to get the dependent to quit drinking or shooting up.
She will stick it out for a hundred years and go to any extent to make things
work out right. By "right" the martyr means "the way the
martyr wants them to." She will burn out or go nuts or both. The only
thing the martyr will not be able to do is make a difference in the
dependent's habits.
|
The Doer
|
The
doer is the family’s outstanding performer, the super responsible
performance-oriented one who makes good grades, excels in athletics, takes
care of siblings, or serves as a surrogate spouse. Self-appointed, the doer
is the overdeveloped, overstressed family member.
|
The Rescuer
|
The
rescuer is going to salvage the situation, whatever it is. The rescuer will
get a second job to pay the bills. He will bail out the dependent, hire the
attorney, pay the estranged teen-aged child's rent and do the jobs that would
otherwise go undone.
|
Persecutor
|
Persecutor says, "It's all your fault!" The persecutor
lays blame liberally everywhere but on the self. He tells all the family
members exactly what they are doing wrong and why they have not achieved
perfection. The persecutor is not a pleasant person to be in the same county
with.
|
Victim
|
Oh,
poor victim -- she didn't ask for any of this. The victim could be happy if
only all this weren't happening. She is the soul most to be pitied, because
she is so very nice down inside that none of this is deserved. This role is
not to be confused with actual victimization. True victims usually do not
perceive themselves as victims in this intensely self-pitying sense.
|
Critic
|
The
critic is negative and faultfinding, using sarcasm and mean-spirited teasing
as a weapon to gain power in the family.
|
Prince/Princess
|
This
child is the victim of a subtle and intense form of emotional incest in which
the child is required to fulfill the needs of the abuser. “The abuser” uses
the child by drawing them into adult conversations or activities. He may
confide to about his own problems with his spouse or violate her boundaries
through sexual grooming or outright sexual abuse.
|
Saint
|
This
family member’s worth in the system is dependent on fulfilling a
predetermined occupation or course of action, regardless of the needs or
wishes of the individual involved.
|
Mastermind
|
The
manipulator is the clever controller in the family, the one who instinctively
knows how to use any and every trick to assure that he will get what he
wants.
|
Spot on as usual :)
ReplyDelete